The UN and Israel (Cartoon)

Why Israel Must Retain Defensible Borders

A couple of must-reads on Israel today:

Adrienne's Corner has a great video explaining Israel's defensible borders and why they must be retained.  See it here.

Robert Ringer has an excellent article on the history of the Israeli-Arab conflict, The Truth About the Israeli "Occupiers."  Read it here.

My opinion on Israel's future:

1.  Israel should reclaim control of the Gaza Strip and open the area to Israeli settlements.
2.  Israel should proclaim that all of its ancestral lands are under control of Israel and will remain so.
3.  Israel should remove the Muslim "Dome of the Rock" and rebuild the Jewish temple on its original site.  The Dome of the Rock could be moved elsewhere, out of Israel.
4.  Israel should expand its borders beyond its ancestral ones to include a broader defensive zone, incorporating parts of Syria, Jordan and Egypt.  The so-called "Palestinians" could be moved into these areas, thus creating their desired homeland, and getting the bomb-throwing cutthroats out of Israel. 
This should be planned for the next Arabic invasion, not implemented immediately.  (Whenever Israel is attacked, the price will be more Arabic land appropriated by Israel.)
5.  Israelis should start a Jewish educational outreach and missionary program, to open the religion to many more people, thereby increasing the numbers of Jews in the world, and more defenders of Israel.

Netanyahu Schools Obama: Israel Will NOT Return to Its 1967 Borders! (Photoshop)

In a meeting today in the Oval Office, Benjamin Netanyahu (of Israel) responded to Obama's Palestinian peace plan by rejecting it.

Apparently, Obama had not been able to write Netanyahu's remarks for him, because the latter stated categorically that Israel would not return to its 1967 borders as prescribed by President Obama.  Further, Israel would not allow Palestinians the much demanded "right of return," effectively barring them from immigrating to Israel.

According to Rush, who viewed the exchange, Obama stared daggers at Netanyahu while the latter spoke, but to no avail.  It appears Obama will have to seek his legacy by throwing some other nation under the bus.

Read more about it here.

The "Two-State Solution" is a Desert Mirage

Tiny Israel is Shown in Red

So now our college sophomore pretending to be a president wants to give away the ranch to the Palestinians.  President Obama has given a speech calling on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Arabic dispute over the boundaries of Israel.  He also stated that Israel should return to its pre-1967 borders, ceding territory taken from the Arabs after the latter attacked Israel.  I say "Hell no."

The dispute in a nutshell:
1.  Arabs want Israel to disappear.  Their reasons are religious as well as bigoted.  Their glorious, false prophet Muhammad said on his death bed that "Two religions may not dwell together on the Arabian Peninsula."  He meant that only Islam should be allowed.  Further, Muhammad hated Jews for rejecting his "prophethood."  He murdered as many as he could and commanded his followers to do the same.  Jew-hatred is an integral, formal part of Islamic belief and scripture.  The intense Arabic hatred of Israel is both religious and cultural; it has nothing to do with "stolen" lands or Israeli "occupation" and persecution.

2.  The Two-State Solution is an illusion.  Liberals and Democrats cannot solve the real problem, i.e. Islamic intolerance, violence and bigotry, so they invent an alternative problem to solve, i.e. "the two-state solution."

Let's all pretend that what the "Palestinians" want is their own country, side by side with Israel.  This is clearly nonsense; the "Palestinians" want a "one-state" solution, i.e. their own country situated where Israel now exists.

The "two-state" solution will simply buy the Arabs more land from which to launch new attacks on the newly shrunken Israel.  It will make Israel weaker and will not change the Arabs' ultimate goal, which is to make Israel disappear.  The attacks on Israel will continue unabated within hours after such a deal is signed.  The so-called two-state solution will not bring peace and should be abandoned.  The only acceptable solution to homeless Arabs in Israel is to require the surrounding, massive Muslim territories to resettle them in Arabic countries and out of Israel.


"Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian
identity serves only tactical purposes. The
founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool
in the continuing battle against Israel ..."
- - Zuheir Muhsin, late Military Department head
of the PLO and member of its Executive
Council, Dutch daily Trouw, March 1977

See also "Origins of Arab-Jewish Conflict"

Islam Will Dominate the World? Not So Fast.... (Photoshop)

Islam Israel Will Dominate the World!

We've all seen this photo of a Muslim somewhere in the U.K. carrying a sign that says ISLAM WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD.

Here's a nice Photoshop of the photo, changed in such a way as to make this barbarian's friends look at him with suspicion.

Celebrate Nakba! "From the River to the Sea!" Long Live Israel!

"Nakba" is an Arabic word that refers to the anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel.  It means "day of disaster."  That's because Muslim barbarians find a tolerant and highly developed civilization in their midst to be unacceptable.  Too damn bad.

Here is my graphic in celebration of Nakba!  May every day be Nakba for Islam.

"Ron Paul is a Vicious Anti-Semite" -- David Horowitz

I have never liked Ron Paul, due mainly to his anti-American rhetoric.  Like the far left, Paul blames America first, for every war and conflagration.  I thought Ron Paul was nuts before I ever heard the term "neo-con," a term used for every conservative who doesn't hate his own country.

Ron Paul blames the United States for the Muslim attack of 9/11 and states that he does not blame Islam for it. Paul believes America is an imperialist empire.  On foreign policy, Paul is probably closer to Code Pink than to Ronald Reagan.  This is unfortunate, because on economic matters Paul is generally spot-on, i.e., he believes in laissez-fair capitalism.  This is the strange dichotomy of the paleconservatives, who seem to be political schizophrenics:  far left on some issues, far right on others.

Now David Horowitz has an article about Ron Paul at News Real blog.  It appears that Ron Paul wants to end all aid to Israel.  Paulites are loudly arguing that this is not evidence of Paul's anti-semitism, but I just don't buy it.

Read it all here.